
Rudyville:
Urban Sprawl Comes to Borrego
This post concerns an assault on Borrego that, while not a direct threat to
the Borrego Valley aquifer, is nonetheless highly objectionable in many of
its aspects and will have a long-term, deleterious, secondary affect that is
inimical to groundwater management efforts in the valley.
The
San Diego county Department of Planning and Land Use is considering a permit
request for project known as Country Club Estates located in Borrego Springs
on 172 undisturbed acres north of Country Club Road and east of Borrego
Springs Road (Case Number TM5487, APNs
198-320-01 and 198-320-26), hereafter “The Project” (aka
“Rudyville” after the developer Rudy Monica).
Concerns about The Project fall primarily into two broad categories:
Density and Environmental Damage.
With respect to density:
-
The overall size and
density of the project is too great; and the project in whole is not in
keeping with the character of the community or the area in which it is
located. As planned, it will constitute an anomalous, visual
blight on the landscape.
-
Inspection of the
plat map for the project discloses that parcel size within the project
area is less than proximate parcels; most especially those west and
northwest of it where lot sizes are commonly two to two and one half
acres.
-
The visual evidence,
however, does not tell the whole story. Many home owners around
the project area have purchased vacant lots adjacent to and even across
the street/road from their residence in order to prevent these
properties from being developed. As a result, the de facto
lot size in areas surrounding The Project is often from two to four
times as large as the legal description of the parcel on which many
homes are actually located.
-
The density of The
Project completely disregards the concept of “feathering” or reducing
the density as an inverse function of the distance from the town center.
The Project site is on the southern edge of the built up area of Borrego
Springs and so, under this concept, should have a lower density than
areas to the north.
-
The density of The
Project will result in a significant increase in traffic on Country Club
and Broken Arrow Roads into the town center and aggravate the already
dangerous situation that exists at their junction.
-
There are already
about 2,000 vacant lots of 1 acre or less in Borrego Springs.
There is simply no demonstrable need for an additional 149 similar lots.
With respect to environmental factors:
-
The project site is
a pristine area the loss of which cannot easily be mitigated, if at all.
In any case, it should not be sacrificed to provide unneeded building
sites.
-
There are burrowing
owl nests on the property that will be destroyed by The Project;
-
There is a thriving
ocotillo forest covering the property, and the density of the proposed
development will inevitably result in destruction of most if not all of
it;
-
There is a
significant sand dune near the north boundary of the property that will
either be destroyed outright by extensive grading or so denuded and
destabilized that it will be very quickly eroded by fierce winds that
blow across the desert. In either case the dune will be destroyed
by The Project;
-
Grading or denuding
and destabilizing the dune will result in blowing sand and dust that
will degrade air quality in the valley;
-
A secondary, but no
less important, environmental impact of The Project is the damage it
will do to a major effort to protect the valley’s critically
overdrafted, sole-source aquifer. At least 70% of water extracted
from the aquifer each year is for irrigation. In 2004, the Borrego
Springs Community Sponsor Group (BSCSG) was successful in increasing the
density of about 5,000 acres of farm land in the northern part of the
valley from one dwelling unit (du) per 20
acres, to one du per 4 acres in General Plan
2020. The sole purpose of the increase was to facilitate sale of
farms for estate developments to reduce demand on the aquifer from
irrigation. Permitting The Project on virgin land will seriously
undermine this groundwater management strategy by adding 148 redundant
homesites to the existing inventory,
competing with and slowing the development of farmland, and hastening
the degradation and depletion of the valley’s only water source.
Applicant has repeatedly demonstrated a callous disregard for environmental
and aesthetic values that are widely shared in the community. More
than 70 residents of the area surrounding the project area attended a BSCSG
meeting on 4 April 2006 to protest the project. No one supported it.
Moreover, Applicant has consistently ignored recommendations from the BSCSG,
which voted in April 2006 to deny a permit for The Project and continues to
vigorously oppose it.
In
light of the foregoing then, the county must at least require a full
Environmental Impact Report on the proposed project area and hold public
meetings in Borrego Springs where residents can present their case against
The Project directly to decision makers. Failure to do so will result
in a less than informed decision regarding a project that promises
significant negative consequences for the community and the environment.
It
appears that the county is poised to issue a “negative declaration” for this
project; which means that no Environmental Impact Report for the project
site will be required. If you want to register a complaint about this
potential blight on the landscape, and you should, contact:
Mr.
Bill Stocks, Project Manager
5201 Ruffin Road, Suit B
San Diego, CA
92123
858.694.3913
William.stocks@sdcounty.ca.gov
ASAP!
05/16/07
Top of Page
Home
Notes from Underground
Links
Hey
Digger!