The Story of Five Little Pigs on the
BWD Board
So, upon learning
that BWD was flush with cash, the
board took immediate action to correct the situation. They
“unanimously approved implementing an existing policy that will pay the
entire cost of providing health insurance for
themselves” and their dependents, amended the policy “to include
domestic partners,” and stuck it to ratepayers again.
- If all five directors and their
significant others opt for insurance – and who wouldn’t – the total
cost to ratepayers will be $$118,400.00
per year, $23,680.00
per director, at a cost to each ratepayer of $59.20
based on figures in the Sun. That is more than one
quarter of the annualized monthly “Base Charge” of $19.58/month that
BWD levies on rate payers and probably exceeds the aggregate cost of
the tiered rate proposal that caused such a furor last year.
(See Worksheet for
details)
- There is no difference in
principle between what the BWD board has done and what Wall Street
and Detroit corporate officers did. The differences are of
scale, which makes board members look pathetic, and that board
members have their snouts in the public trough, which makes their
actions the more reprehensible.
- It is no coincidence that this
boondoggle was not previously discussed in public and came to light
only after the November election. After all, even in Borrego
someone might have noticed.
Board members'
avarice is unseemly and tawdry. If they devoted half as much
effort to guaranteeing a sustainable water supply for Borrego as they do
to feathering their own nests, they might actually accomplish
something. Yeah, that’ll happen.
See also:
BWD’s Claims to Openness and Public Participation Ring
Hollow